Bespokit

Organise requirements into a standard spec,
and return
software you can review

Plans, documents, and images are organised into a standard spec, and design, code, and deployment artefacts are produced against reusable code assets. Feature scope and acceptance criteria are fixed per project.

PDF · DOCX
MD · images
Requirement material normalised
Reusable assets
Reuse
Scope set by separating reuse
from new development
Handover scope
Written into the contract
Code, documents, repository
Terms agreed
Features and integrations
Scope estimated
Schedule and review plan
matched to the project's terms

Two problems you hit
on every real project

Problem 01

The endless code review loop

“Settlement is done.” “Settlement needs amount precision, idempotency keys, and compensation handling. Look at the previous project and redo it…” Every single time.

Reuse through RAG

Standard code organised from previous projects is referenced as generation context. Whether to reuse it is reviewed against the current project's conditions.

Problem 02

Manually stitching scattered material together

Screen definitions live in Figma or slides, functional specs in spreadsheets or Notion. Organising them alone passes through several tools and people, and handover means organising them again.

Organised into a standard spec

Requirements are organised into a standard spec and Markdown design documents. People and AI refer to the same acceptance criteria.

The same criteria organise the requirements,
and a repeatable process generates the result

A four-stage pipeline connects requirements, design, code, and handover criteria into one flow.

A

Take the requirements

Whatever material you already hold goes in: plans, documents, images. We review base templates for your stack and the assets available for reuse, and set the starting line.

What you seeAn empty repository with the base folders
B

Generate the design

Conversation and material become a standard spec and Markdown design documents. Missing items and decisions still needed are flagged and collected for review.

What you see11 .md files under docs/
C

AI writes the code

An AI agent reads the design documents, generates code in an isolated working environment, and records its progress. People check the result at the review points you agreed.

What you seeA live code-writing log
D

Publish the repository

Changes against the base are collected and handed over as a repository for your project, together with the design documents and a completion report.

What you seeA private repo and a completion notice

Not one line of code,
the technology to build a whole project

Code asset search, design document generation, infrastructure configuration, and requirement analysis are connected across the whole project flow.

01 · RAG

Code asset search

Code assets accumulated across our own projects are normalised and searched semantically. Only assets that fit the project's conditions are reviewed and reused.

02 · Ontology

Automated project design

Natural language conversation becomes a single source of truth across 7 areas and 11 Markdown documents. It is the one reference people, AI, and code all read.

03 · IaC

Automated infrastructure

AWS, GCP, and NCP setups and CI/CD are managed as Terraform templates. What actually gets applied is decided against your account permissions, network, and security policy.

04 · Prompt Chain

Automated requirement analysis

Large work is split into domain analysis, data modelling, API design, screen definition, and code generation, and each stage is checked for gaps and review items.

Five modules,
one production system

bespokit saas

User interface

The web app where you watch and steer conversation to spec to docs to autonomous coding.

bespokit-engine

The automation brain

Runs stages A to D, isolates workspaces, and controls concurrency.

becode

RAG backbone

Code assets organised from our own projects, referenced during generation.

beskit

Coding tool plugin

The standard development process as slash commands, usable in Cursor, Copilot, or anywhere else.

bestack

Sales intelligence

Turns a finished repository into a catalogue of business terms.

Compare the two approaches
on the same criteria

CriterionConventional bespoke buildBespokit
Schedule estimateEstimated from feature, integration, and approval scopeEstimated after reviewing the standard spec and reusable assets
Cost estimateQuoted on headcount and durationQuoted by separating reuse from new features
HandoverVaries with documentation and repository practiceSpec, documents, and repository handed over together
Asset reuseNew development scope separated
Repeatable processStandard review procedure
Handover scopeWritten into the contract
Documents and repositoryHandover criteria

Enterprise, mid-market, or startup,
the domain does not matter

This is the scope of work visible in our publicly listed cases.

Case 01 · AX transformation

AX transformation support for an apparel OEM

Domain knowledge base and chatbot agent build

Hojeon Limited

Case 02 · D2C storefront

D2C storefront platform build

Platform build and market launch

Piuda

Case 03 · Alpha Launch

Several alpha services launched on short timelines

Short-cycle build and launch for market validation

Woodic · Loever · UIBall · Rabbit Guide

Case 04 · ERP

Company-wide ERP build

Company-wide ERP for a semiconductor business

ASICLAND

Case 05 · AX transformation

HR AX transformation PoC

Domain knowledge base and chatbot agent pipeline

CJ Logistics

Case 06 · Web

Enterprise brand website build

Brand website design and build

C&C International

Frequently asked questions

The conditions people check most often before adopting.

What kind of requirements can we start with?

Whatever you already hold: a plan, a feature list, screen images, existing operational documents. Depending on how complete the material is, the work may start with a stage that organises the requirements and the acceptance criteria.

Can the generated code be deployed straight away?

That depends on feature scope, testing, security review, external integrations, and your approval conditions. What we hand over as a repository and documents is what passed the acceptance criteria agreed for the project.

Can it connect to our existing systems and code?

Yes. We review the existing repository's structure, licences, technical debt, and the access conditions for its APIs and databases, then separate what to reuse, what to replace, and what to build new.

Who owns the code and the deliverables?

The contract sets out the handover scope for the code repository, design documents, data, external libraries, accounts, and infrastructure. Open source and third-party services remain subject to their own licences and terms.

What drives the schedule and the cost?

Business rule complexity, systems to integrate, data migration, design, security, and approval processes affect schedule and cost far more than the number of features. After a consultation we quote by separating reuse of standard assets from new development.

Start your next project
with a single conversation

We review your current requirements and integration environment, then propose the build scope and the next step.